Wong Sun v. United States

Wong Sun v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 29, April 2, 1962
Reargued October 8, 1962
Decided January 14, 1963
Full case name Wong Sun, et al. v. United States
Citations 371 U.S. 471 (more)
83 S. Ct. 407; 9 L. Ed. 2d 441; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2431
Prior history Cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Holding
The presentation of verbal evidence and recovered narcotics where they were both fruits of an illegal entry are inadmissible in court except where there is a break in the chain of evidence.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Brennan, joined by Warren, Black, Goldberg
Concurrence Douglas
Dissent Clark, joined by Harlan, Stewart, White

Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963), is a United States Supreme Court decision excluding the presentation of verbal evidence and recovered narcotics where they were both fruits of an illegal entry. Narcotics agents unlawfully entered Toy's laundry at which point Toy indicated that Yee was selling narcotics. The drug agents then went to Yee and found the narcotics. Yee made a deal to give up his supplier, Wong Sun. Wong Sun was a prominent businessman, so the police invited him for a conversation about the case. Following this conversation, Wong Sun voluntarily returned to the police station to make a deal of his own, during the process of which he confessed. At Yee's trial, Toy's statements and the discovered drugs were both excluded as fruit of the poisonous tree because the search was done without a warrant. Wong Sun's lawyer argued that Wong Sun's confession should also be excluded as fruit of the poisonous tree. The court affirmed the fruit of the poisonous tree rule, but found an exception to exclusion in Wong Sun's case on the grounds that Wong Sun had voluntarily returned to the police station to make his statement, an act which had "become so attenuated as to dissipate the taint" or broke the chain of inadmissible evidence. Wong Sun was granted a new trial, but his confession was admissible.

External links